QntDesk

Vision

A network of networks, not another chain.

The Internet of Value is a connectivity problem. Overledger’s claim is to sit above ledgers and core systems the way TCP/IP sat above physical networks — a gateway operating system, not a twelfth blockchain.

Whitepaper · 2018

Applications should not be trapped on a single ledger.

Verdian, Tasca, Paterson, Mondelli — Quant Overledger whitepaper v0.1, archived at UCL Discovery. That sentence is still the product.

Open the whitepaper reader →

Then

TCP/IP for packets

Applications stopped caring which physical network carried the bits. Ethernet, satellite, serial lines — one internet, many wires.

Now

Overledger for value

Applications should stop caring which ledger, core or rail settles the money. Fabric, Ethereum, Corda, a bank core — one gateway, many domains.

Thesis

A network of networks, not another chain

The 2018 Overledger whitepaper, archived at UCL Discovery, is unusually clear for a crypto-era document: the problem is single-ledger dependency. Applications that want to move value should not have to pick Ethereum or Fabric or a bank core and live there. Overledger’s claim is to sit above those domains the way TCP/IP sat above physical networks — a gateway operating system. Gilbert Verdian’s career (Vocalink, Mastercard, UK government CISO work, ISO/TC 307) is the industrial version of that sentence. Paolo Tasca’s books are the philosophical one. Colin Paterson and Gaetano Mondelli signed the same document and the same US ordering patent.

Philosophy

The Internet of Value is a connectivity problem

Tasca’s 2020 Frontiers essay calls the Internet of Value ‘a risky necessity’: moving value as easily as packets is coming, and with it datafication, platformisation and privacy risk. Enabling the Internet of Value (Springer, 2022) treats blockchain as connective tissue for global business, not as a speculative venue. Banking Beyond Banks and Money (2016) asked the prior question — what remains of a bank when money is software. Overledger is one engineered answer: put a governed gateway in front of many ledgers so regulated institutions do not have to become exchanges. The risk does not disappear; it is concentrated where it can be audited.

Taxonomy

Gateways, not bridges, not a twelfth chain

The 2023 ACM DLT paper — Belchior, Riley, Hardjono, Vasconcelos, Correia — is the academic statement of the same idea. Interoperability has modes (data, asset transfer, asset exchange) and infrastructure (nodes, proxies, gateways). Quant’s product claim occupies the gateway cell. Riley’s 2021 Quant note and Hyperledger webinar are the industrial walkthrough of that taxonomy. Belchior’s 2021 ACM Computing Surveys review (284 papers) is the map of everything else people have tried: public connectors, blockchain engines, hybrid connectors. Read those three before any homepage.

Architecture

Three layers of money, one horizontal layer

In April 2026 Verdian published the three-layer digital money architecture. Layer 1 is wholesale central-bank money and RTGS finality. Layer 2 is tokenised commercial-bank deposits — GBTD lives here. Layer 3 is public-chain stablecoins and tokenised real-world assets. The system only coheres, he writes, when all three can talk to each other and to SWIFT, Faster Payments, Open Banking. That horizontal interoperability layer is the Overledger job. Fusion is the multi-ledger rollup Quant now ships on top; PayScript is how money is programmed once it is connected.

Discipline

Three things that are not each other

Internet of Value is a thesis. SATP is an IETF work item (ODAP was the 2020 name). GBTD is a UK tokenised-deposit pilot with Quant as technology partner. Project Rosalind was a 2023 BIS × Bank of England API experiment Quant says it supplied as a vendor — concluded, not a standing Basel office. None of those are a live CBDC. The bigger vision is still the 2018 one: connect the networks that already exist.

The stack of money

Three layers, one horizontal gate

Verdian’s 2026 diagram, rendered without a map. Each band is a different liability. The gate is Overledger.

  1. 01Wholesale CBDC / RTGSCentral-bank liability. Finality. Synchronisation Lab sits adjacent — experiment, not a digital pound.
  2. 02Tokenised depositsCommercial-bank liability. GBTD lives here. Programmable M1, still a bank IOU.
  3. 03Stablecoins & public-chain RWAsPrivate or protocol liability. Liquidity and DeFi. Not the subject of the UK pilot.
  4. Horizontal interoperabilityOverledger. Talks to all three and to SWIFT, Faster Payments, Open Banking. Without it the layers silo.

Library of the thesis

Books and papers the vision is built from

2018

Overledger whitepaper v0.1

Verdian, Tasca, Paterson, Mondelli

The primary source. Gateway OS, not L1.

Open →

2023

Do You Need a DLT Interoperability Solution?

Belchior, Riley, Hardjono, Vasconcelos, Correia

ACM DLT. The academic taxonomy Overledger occupies.

Open →

2021

A Survey on Blockchain Interoperability

Belchior, Vasconcelos, Guerreiro, Correia

ACM Computing Surveys. 284 papers. The map of the field.

Open →

2022

Enabling the Internet of Value

Tasca & Treiblmaier (eds.)

Springer. Blockchain as connective tissue.

Open →

2016

Banking Beyond Banks and Money

Tasca, Aste, Pelizzon, Perony

Springer. Pre-history of programmable deposits.

Open →

2020

Internet of Value: A Risky Necessity

Paolo Tasca

Frontiers in Blockchain. Governance as the price.

Open →

2021

DLT interoperability: what are the options?

Luke Riley

Quant research note + PDF. API gateway as the practical category.

Open →

2018

Overledger Network Treasury

Quant

Design note from the whitepaper era.

Open →

Did you know

The future of money, as a question.